<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The gutless way to change copyright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hourann.com/blog/2006/05/14/the-gutless-way-to-change-copyright/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hourann.com/blog/2006/05/14/the-gutless-way-to-change-copyright</link>
	<description>Hourann’s illogical blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Pencil Guy &#187; Archive &#187; Some goings-on in Canberra</title>
		<link>http://hourann.com/blog/2006/05/14/the-gutless-way-to-change-copyright#comment-6876</link>
		<dc:creator>The Pencil Guy &#187; Archive &#187; Some goings-on in Canberra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 08:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pencilguy.dview.net/blog/2006/05/14/the-gutless-way-to-change-copyright#comment-6876</guid>
		<description>[...] The amendment act was changed from the one proposed a few months ago just before the vote, and Kim Weatherall offered up a thoughtful assessment: Yes, despite the rising chorus of concern about the criminal provisions; despite the complete absence of any serious consultation process prior to these laws being released, they&#8217;ve done only a token amount to assuage people&#8217;s concerns here. They&#8217;ve removed the provisions that people were carrying on about the most - the ones that most directly affected ordinary consumers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The amendment act was changed from the one proposed a few months ago just before the vote, and Kim Weatherall offered up a thoughtful assessment: Yes, despite the rising chorus of concern about the criminal provisions; despite the complete absence of any serious consultation process prior to these laws being released, they&#8217;ve done only a token amount to assuage people&#8217;s concerns here. They&#8217;ve removed the provisions that people were carrying on about the most - the ones that most directly affected ordinary consumers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Pencil Guy &#187; Archive &#187; A review of what&#8217;s been posted</title>
		<link>http://hourann.com/blog/2006/05/14/the-gutless-way-to-change-copyright#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>The Pencil Guy &#187; Archive &#187; A review of what&#8217;s been posted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 15:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pencilguy.dview.net/blog/2006/05/14/the-gutless-way-to-change-copyright#comment-560</guid>
		<description>[...] While not writing the essay that I should be writing, I thought I&#8217;d check out what other people wrote after the changes to copyright law announced two Sundays ago. Turns out pretty much anyone with a brain agrees that the changes are ridiculous &#8212; or in SJ Hutcheon&#8217;s words, &#8220;dumb and dumber&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While not writing the essay that I should be writing, I thought I&#8217;d check out what other people wrote after the changes to copyright law announced two Sundays ago. Turns out pretty much anyone with a brain agrees that the changes are ridiculous &#8212; or in SJ Hutcheon&#8217;s words, &#8220;dumb and dumber&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
