While PerthNorg is light on content (which I addressed, if you’d care to read the other comments), there is a strong trend towards user-created content, in more fields than just news, all over the Web. And given the state of our current news services in Perth, I reckon that a local user-generated site is desperately needed, even if just to mix things up a bit.

And that remains true if the owners are monetising their traffic. Slashdot, for instance, has been going great for years even though it carries ads. (Though bear in mind that PerthNorg’s owners are not making money, at least not yet, judging by how few real ads the site has.)

I acknowledge it’s somewhat hypocritical to bag the site for lacking content and not contributing anything, although I was trying to just call it as I saw it. If I’d written a review of Wikipedia in 2002, I’d have criticised it for a lack of content as well, which is not to deny its awesomeness now. (And I do reserve the right to rant on my own blog with no respect for procedural fairness!)

But in your summary of PerthNorg you’ve more or less outlined exactly why I think the site has so much promise. Given some time to establish itself, I can see PerthNorg making a real dent on the local media scene.

Thanks for the write-up and feedback. We’re actually in the process of making some cosmetic changes and putting the voting buttons in a more prominent position is on this week’s agenda.

The point I want to make is about content – we are starting to get some good quality contributors to the site who are having a go and writing. If something interests you and you don’t see it there – then you have the ability to post it to the site. It is a chance for people to bring their passions to the attention of Perth’s public.
So I want to encourage everyone out there to have a go – there’s no point lamenting lack of news and issues and then failing to contribute any.

I came up with the idea of PerthNorg when I realised that people were continully being let down by traditional media companies visions of citizen journalism. Like you pointed out they really do fail to get it.

So I’ll give you a brief rundown of what you can do on the Norg and why:

Creating a link:
You can create links to any media story around the world. We are not tied to any news orgnanisation and this way we can share the best of the best with the Perth community. I think this is where the confusion has come in about us being a “news aggregator” – but to me allowing an easy way to share links to the world’s media was important. It’s also not something most traditional media will be embracing.

Comments:
You can leave your comments here – unmoderated – what you write is what you see.

You can write orginal copy:
If you have an issue to raise, a story to write or something you care about – this is where you have the chance to write about it. You can also create news as an audio file or video and we embed the files on our site. The same goes for photos. This is the area I’d mot like to see people getting involved in.

Voting:
Who decides what news is best? You – voting sends the good stuff to the top. We decided on this model so that the site is truly in the hands of our users.

On that note – I better get back and start doing some writing of my own…

Hopefully I’ll see yo round the Norg!

PS. I’d love some of the feedback to come through my own blog on PerthNorg – Norgdom.

While I haven’t posted any myself, a few of my fellow group members have done so. I’m fairly dubious about the site at the moment – the newsgroups that I had been reading on the site were fairly low-quality, “MySpace”-style news reporting, if you could call it that!

I had also personally been invited to post a few of my gig shots on there. I think I do enough free web contributions to add more to PerthNorg.

I’m waiting to see how it all turns out later.